It’s all about domains with… Charlotte Spencer (WIPO)

A domain name isn’t just a digital address—it’s the foundation of your brand’s identity, shaping how your business is discovered and remembered online. Yet, the global nature of the internet often exposes trademarks to disputes, whether due to bad-faith domain name registrations or overlapping ownership claims across jurisdictions. These conflicts can threaten not only your domains but also your brand’s reputation and integrity.

That’s where the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) comes in, a global framework designed to tackle domain disputes efficiently and outside the traditional court system. Managed by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), a specialized agency of the United Nations, the UDRP streamlines conflict resolution, ensuring protection for trademarks in the namespace. But how does WIPO guide businesses through this maze of legal, digital, and branding complexities?

To answer this question, we’re thrilled to bring you insights from Charlotte Spencer, Senior Legal Officer in the Internet Dispute Resolution Section at WIPO, and a true authority in the domain dispute space. With an academic foundation in European law and over 17 years of experience at WIPO, Charlotte has been instrumental in structuring policies that balance fairness across domain name disputes. Today, she leads a team of legal case managers, handling disputes and advising on ccTLD policies and data protection compliance, while fostering global collaborations to safeguard domains and trademarks.

In this conversation, Charlotte brings us valuable insights into how companies can protect their domains as brand assets. Let’s dive in!

1 What is the UDRP, and how does it help resolve disputes involving domain names and trademarks?

The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) is a globally recognized framework established by ICANN to address disputes involving domain names and trademarks efficiently and equitably. Designed to combat cases of cybersquatting and abusive domain registrations, the UDRP provides an alternative to lengthy and expensive litigation in national courts, making it an invaluable tool for businesses seeking to protect their digital presence.

At its core, the UDRP is an administrative dispute resolution process, enforced as part of the domain name registration agreement. Its application is mandatory for all gTLDs like .com and .net, as well as new gTLDs and many ccTLDs such as .co, .ai, and .tv. This international scope ensures that the UDRP can address a wide range of cases, regardless of jurisdiction. Registrants who sign these agreements consent to the policy, streamlining the resolution process for disputes. WIPO also collaborates with ccTLD registries globally to create tailored, localized versions of the UDRP, further extending its effectiveness.

What is a domain name dispute?

A domain name dispute arises when two or more parties claim ownership or rights to a particular domain name. These disputes often occur due to trademark conflicts, cybersquatting, or registration of similar domain names. Resolutions typically involve legal action or adjudication through processes like the UDRP. Cases brought under the UDRP are reviewed by independent, neutral domain name experts who evaluate evidence and issue binding decisions. Remedies, which typically include transferring the disputed domain names to the rightful trademark owner, are implemented by registrars. While parties retain the option to escalate their disputes to national courts, only a very small fraction of UDRP cases continue to litigation, underscoring its credibility as a trusted resolution process. For businesses navigating trademark and domain challenges, the UDRP is a cornerstone of digital brand protection, offering speed, efficiency, and a global network of enforcement.

2 Why was the UDRP created, and what is WIPO’s role in its development and implementation?

The late ’90s marked the explosive growth of the internet, accompanied by the emergence and expansion of the DNS. This new digital landscape started posing unique challenges for intellectual property (IP) protection, particularly for trademarks. Cybersquatting, where individuals registered domain names reflecting well-known brands for malicious resale or misuse, was becoming a global headache. Clearly, addressing these trademark abuses required a solution that went beyond local jurisdictions—it called for an international approach.

WIPO became a trailblazer in resolving this emerging digital issue. Following extensive global consultations—referred to as the “First WIPO Internet Domain Name Process”—WIPO delivered a groundbreaking recommendation: the creation of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). In 1999, ICANN adopted the UDRP based on WIPO’s recommendations, laying the foundation for what is now the international gold standard for resolving domain name disputes.

WIPO didn’t stop there. It was appointed as the first dispute resolution provider for UDRP cases and became the global leader in domain name recovery services. More than just administering disputes, WIPO has taken on a stewardship role to ensure the UDRP evolves with consistency and fairness.

What is WIPO?

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations dedicated to strengthening and safeguarding intellectual property (IP) rights on a global scale. Founded in 1967 and headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, WIPO provides the framework for protecting patents, trademarks, copyrights, and even domain names. It’s more than just an administrative body—it’s a central hub for innovation, offering services like dispute resolution (such as under the UDRP), IP harmonization, and expert guidance to creators and businesses worldwide. WIPO’s work touches every corner of the digital and creative economy, ensuring that ideas thrive while rights are respected.

3 How are intellectual property rights, domain names, and disputes interconnected?

Let’s start with the basics: domain names are unique identifiers within the online world, fundamental to how users navigate the internet. However, the process of domain name registration operates on a “first come, first served” basis. With registration fees often set at just a few dollars and no screening process as to the identity of the registrant or their intended use. This accessibility opens the door to misuse. For trademark owners, this creates a significant challenge—they cannot prevent others from registering domains that incorporate their protected trademarks, leaving their brand vulnerable to infringement and exploitation.

In principle, registrants are responsible for ensuring their chosen domain does not infringe on any third-party trademark rights. But in practice, this responsibility is often overlooked, leading to disputes. When a company neglects to secure a key domain tied to its brand or fails to address infringing domain names, this can result in diverted web traffic—sometimes for fraudulent purposes like phishing schemes—and cause reputational and financial harm to the brand owner.

What is cybersquatting?

Cybersquatting, also known as domain squatting, refers to the practice of registering, trafficking, or using a domain name with the intent to profit from a legitimate brand’s trademark, reputation, or goodwill. These bad-faith registrants often target well-known trademarks or businesses, hoping to sell the domain back to the rightful owner at an inflated price or use it for deceptive purposes like phishing, counterfeit sales, or impersonation. The intent here is key—cybersquatters exploit the first-come, first-served nature of domain registration to gain control over domains that rightfully belong to brands or trademark owners. Their motives can range from hosting unrelated content like gambling sites to outright fraud, such as impersonating the brand owner to send phishing emails or defraud consumers. Other common infringement issues include the sale of counterfeit goods or unauthorized resale under the guise of legitimacy.

This intersection between intellectual property rights and domain name registration is a critical area for businesses to understand and address proactively. Protecting your brand in the digital space isn’t just about owning the right domain—it’s about staying vigilant against bad actors and knowing how to respond.

One of WIPO’s most influential contributions is the WIPO Overview 3.0, a comprehensive online resource that distills key UDRP-decision trends and consensus views from arbitration panels. This widely consulted tool has become an essential roadmap for domain name practitioners and brand owners.

4 What are the main criteria outlined in the UDRP that determine whether a domain name infringes upon a trademark owner’s rights?

To successfully argue a UDRP complaint, three essential and cumulative criteria must be met. Let’s break them down:

1. Trademark ownership and similarity

The complainant must first demonstrate their rights in a trademark, and establish that the disputed domain name is either identical or “confusingly similar” to that trademark. While having a registered trademark can make this step more straightforward, it’s important to note that registration is not mandatory. With appropriate evidence, unregistered trademarks may form the basis of a UDRP complaint, provided the complainant can prove that the unregistered trademark has gained distinctiveness through consistent use in commerce. For cases involving unregistered marks, specific evidence—such as documented use and recognition in the market—should be presented to support the claim.

2. Lack of rights or legitimate interests

Next, the complainant must demonstrate that the registrant does not have legitimate rights or interests in the domain name. This means showing that the registrant isn’t using the domain name in connection with legitimate business activities, isn’t commonly known by the domain name, and isn’t making fair or non-commercial use of the domain name. Essentially, the respondent should have no reasonable claim that justifies their possession of the domain.

3. Registration and use in bad faith

The third and, sometimes most challenging criterion is proving that the domain name was both registered and is being used in bad faith. This involves showing intent to exploit the domain name at the expense of the trademark owner. Examples of bad faith include attempting to sell the domain name to the trademark owner for an inflated price, redirecting users to competing services, or using the domain to mislead or harm the reputation of the trademark owner. This dual requirement—bad faith in both registration and usage—often presents the most complicated hurdle for complainants, as clear evidence is essential.

5 What recent statistics shed light on the volume of UDRP cases handled by WIPO? Are there any emerging trends in the industries or behaviors associated with disputed domains?

WIPO’s UDRP cases provide some fascinating insights. Since December 1999, WIPO has administered over 77,000 domain name disputes, recovering approx. 110,000 domain names globally. These figures highlight how the UDRP remains a cornerstone in safeguarding trademark rights online.

Fast forward to 2024, and the momentum shows no signs of slowing down. According to the WIPO Domain Name Report 2024, we handled 6,168 complaints—the second-highest annual volume ever recorded. This underscores not just the relevance but the growing necessity of the UDRP for businesses aiming to protect their online identities across an increasingly competitive and often deceptive domain space.

Trademark holders span a diverse array of industries, reflecting the broad impact of domain name infringement.

Beyond the sheer scale of cases, what’s particularly compelling are the patterns in abusive domain activity. Several key issues continue to drive disputes:

• Counterfeiting: Counterfeiting is a persistent challenge, especially for industries like fashion and pharmaceuticals, where both brand reputation and public safety are at stake. Fraudsters often exploit domain names to mimic legitimate companies, selling counterfeit goods or distributing unapproved medicines.

• Phishing schemes: The banking and finance sector faces consistent threats from phishing schemes—a practice where disputed domains are used to trick users into disclosing sensitive financial information.

• Fraudulent activity: Fraud extends beyond phishing and into tactics such as impersonating legitimate companies or their business partners to issue fake invoices, solicit confidential employee data through HR scams, or even divert payments. These scams increasingly crop up across multiple industries as bad actors refine their tactics.

It’s all about domains with… Tim Switzer (PIR)

In the vast digital landscape, domain names serve as cornerstones for identity, guiding users to…

BIMI implementation with VMC | Info & How-to

Due to rising digitalization and internet usage, email has become an essential communication tool in…

Digital trust | The bedrock of business success

In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, the need for secure interactions between businesses, customers and…

Smart site seals | For trust and engagement

In this article, we give you an overview of the basics – what exactly a…

6 What practical steps can organizations take to prevent disputes and ensure their intellectual property is safeguarded?

Protecting your domain name should be a cornerstone of your brand protection strategy. You can proactively safeguard your domain names and trademark online minimizing the risk of disputes and strengthening your brand in the digital space.

1. Register early and strategically

One of the best preventive measures is to register your domain names early, ideally at the same time as establishing your business and securing your trademark. This proactive approach prevents future complications and closes the door on opportunistic third parties looking to exploit gaps in your brand’s online presence.

2. Monitor and stay vigilant

Maintaining ongoing oversight of how your brand is represented online is key. Use monitoring tools to track any misuse of your brand, including domain name registrations that mimic or infringe on your identity. Detecting these issues early can help you respond before they escalate.

3. Develop a domain name strategy

A well-thought-out multi-domain strategy can save your organization countless headaches down the road. Simple yet impactful practices, such as registering domain names under the company’s name rather than under an individual employee, can ensure control remains in the hands of your organization.

4. Build a robust domain name portfolio

Creating a domain name portfolio that reflects your brand across relevant gTLDs and ccTLDs is essential. This not only strengthens your global reach but also allows your brand to dominate key markets. A strategic portfolio ensures your digital presence is expansive, secure, and aligned with your business goals.

5. Turn to WIPO for disputes

Despite your best efforts, disputes may sometimes arise. When they do, organizations can leverage WIPO’s domain name services, which offer a quick, cost-effective, and highly trusted process for reclaiming infringing domain names under frameworks like the UDRP.

If you are faced with a dispute, WIPO’s domain name services are quick and cost-effective and can help you reclaim the infringing domain name!

Detecting domain fraud is extremely research- and cost-intensive. Thanks to the Trademark Research Services in AutoDNS, it is now possible for the first time to automatically detect potential infringements of trademark law involving domains and to take prompt legal action.

Use Trademark Research